« Back to GR Energy & Climate Briefs Archive

December 6th, 2010
POWERMAP
Commentary and Analysis
Key Issues
News
Names in the News

The Cancún climate change summit is proving that leadership over the global agenda is shifting away from the developed countries and toward the BRICs. Though still fragile, negotiations appear headed at arriving at limited, discrete deals, with bilateral and national actions now shouldering the bulk of the responsibility for controlling carbon emissions. In this GR Brief, the developments at Cancún will be examined in detail, as well what the likely outcomes may hold for future action on energy and climate.

ARTICLES

The Explanation for a Puzzling Pattern in Gas Prices »

On Climate Change, Canada Comes Clean »

China, Brazil Announce “Macro-Prudent” Measures »

How Are China and the U.S. Building a Clean-Energy Workforce? »

OUTLOOK

The Cancún climate summit is demonstrating every day just how much and how quickly the power dynamic in the world is moving from one of European and American preeminence to a world where countries like China, India and Brazil will shape the future course of global negotiations.   The most important countries by far in terms of shaping the Cancún talks have been the BASIC countries – Brazil, South Africa, India, and China, as well as the host nation, Mexico. When the annual UN climate change summit opened, the overall goals were very different from the previous year's summit in Copenhagen, and this was driven by China above all.  At this year’s talks, delegates have been working on more limited deals, such as establishing a proposed fund to help poor countries adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change, rather than a comprehensive treaty.  Brazil, India, and China have been driving the negotiations on a host of issues, and depending on the issue, Russia and South Africa have also been influential, though have different interests, so both the BRIC and BASIC blocs have been influential.  However, the talks have also served to preserve the viability of maintaining global talks in the future, an outcome that was in doubt for much of 2010.  In today’s GR Energy and Climate Brief, Garten Rothkopf assesses the developments at Cancún thus far, and what the consequences of the summit might be for future climate negotiations.

Source: WRI


Developed Countries as Spoilers?

One key way in which Cancún differs from Copenhagen is the roster of countries most invested in a positive outcome.  At Copenhagen, negotiations came down to a standoff between the US, pushing for an agreement in which the largest emitting developing countries would observe some sort of binding commitment, and the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China), which opposed any such commitment without more stringent emissions reduction targets for developed countries and financial assistance for developing countries to assist with addressing climate change. 

Full article here.

06 December 2010
John Juech / Isaac Smith
GR ANALYSIS
Climate Change
06 Dec 2010
Bioenergy
06 Dec 2010
Fossil Energy
06 Dec 2010
Alternative Vehicles
06 Dec 2010
Renewables
06 Dec 2010



KEY READS
From “Change” to Gridlock: The US Midterm Elections 2010
December 2010
Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik
China and the South China Sea
December 2010
Danish Institute for International Studies
NAMES IN THE NEWS
(D-CA)
US Sentate

Boxer said today that Senate Dems will need to “play defense” against efforts by Republicans to question climate science in the next Congress.

(D-AK)
US Senate

Begich warned that Joe Miller’s legal pursuits against Sen. Murkowski (R-AK) “could deny Alaska full representation in the Senate” in January.



Garten Rothkopf
1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20036 | phone: 202.457.7920

The material contained within this email is solely for the use of Garten Rothkopf clients, employees, partners and other designated recipients. It is not intended to be quoted, reproduced or circulated in any fashion without the express permission of Garten Rothkopf LLC.